Call Us Now
A lawyer specializing in NDPS (Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances) cases in Delhi plays an important role in representing individuals involved in narcotics-related offenses.
NDPS cases are typically serious, and individuals charged under the NDPS Act, 1985, face severe penalties, including long prison sentences and heavy fines. Expert NDPS lawyer provides expert legal advice, defending clients in court, and securing the best possible outcomes.
Expertise in NDPS Laws
The NDPS Act regulates the control and regulation of operations related to narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances in India. It prescribes stringent measures for the trafficking, possession, and consumption of illegal drugs. NDPS cases include a range of offenses, such as the possession of drugs, trafficking, manufacturing, and the abuse of controlled substances. A lawyer specializing in these cases should have a comprehensive understanding of both the letter of the law and its application in practice.
NDPS offenses carry severe penalties, including life imprisonment or death in extreme cases. For a successful defense, the lawyer must be well-versed in areas like:
Defining what constitutes a narcotic drug: Understanding the substances classified as narcotics and psychotropic substances and how they are categorized.
Procedural lapses: NDPS cases are often complicated due to procedural flaws, such as improper arrests, lack of proper search warrants, or mishandling of evidence. A lawyer must identify such flaws to potentially weaken the prosecution’s case.
Bail applications: Bail in NDPS cases is often difficult to obtain, and lawyers must be skilled at presenting arguments for bail based on the circumstances of the case.
Defending Against NDPS Charges
Our expert lawyer specialized in NDPS cases in Delhi can adopt several strategies to defend their client. We may challenge the accuracy of the forensic evidence, question the manner in which evidence was obtained, or raise doubts about the intent or knowledge of the accused. It’s not uncommon for lawyers to argue that their client was unaware of the possession or was coerced into carrying drugs.